So, your projects are running like an old dilapidated jalopy, eh?
I’ve been there and well…it’s no fun!
And what’s worse, we don’t always know why it’s happening.
It’s not like you plan for things to go wrong. You genuinely care about the project and your project team.
You’re probably working long hours. You feel an increasing sense of anxiety.
What are you doing wrong?
Nobody has the power to correct all the issues we face in our projects, but I can at least offer a tool that will help you build a better foundation for your projects.
Unfortunately, many people think of the project charter as an administrative hoop they must jump through to get their project approved. Therefore, many charters are written hastily with little thought.
The value of the charter process is engaging stakeholders, discussing the issues, resolving conflicts, and getting agreement as you initiate the project. The stakeholder interest is considered and aligned, resulting in less likelihood of costly changes later in the project.
The charter provides a picture of where you are going, why you are going there, who will be impacted, top risks, and who is going to help you.
The sponsor submits the charter to a body such as a project management office (PMO) or project selection committee for approval.
Some project managers spend too little time on the charter; others spend too much time. Keep in mind; the charter is a broad, high-level initiation document, usually not more than two pages. It is not a requirements document or a detailed project plan.
The required time should be commensurate with the size and complexity of the project. For small projects, the charter may be completed in thirty minutes or less. For a multi-year program, the charter process may take several weeks.
[Tweet “Every minute spent in planning saves as many as 10 minutes in execution. -Brian Tracy”]
People resist charters for various reasons. Here are some of the most common ones:
Project charters provide many benefits, some not so obvious:
Involving important stakeholders in the charter process is not only helpful but critical, particularly for large, complex projects.
Before the project kick-off meeting, I schedule a meeting (sometimes a series of meetings) with stakeholders, including the sponsor, to discuss the project. I update the project charter for the sponsor review and then distribute to the stakeholders for their review.
The project sponsor should be the primary author. The project manager to be involved in the charter development. However, the ultimate voice should be the sponsor.
The project manager may meet with the project sponsor, discuss the content, create the charter, and submit the charter to the sponsor for review. Writing a project charter is an iterative process and typically requires a few versions before getting it right.
Writing is an iterative process: Draft the charter. Come back to the charter later and tweak it. After meeting with the stakeholders, update the charter again. This process continues until the charter is mature and ready for approval.
If appropriate stakeholders are engaged in the process, the project manager will not likely need to change the charter during the project.
[Tweet “If I had more time, I’d write a shorter letter. -Pascal”]
You may wish to include some combination of the following information:
Too often, people take action without first defining the problems. Therefore, project members may misunderstand the problems and waste time and money focusing on the wrong things.
Make the problems crystal clear. What is wrong? Where are the problems occurring? What are the magnitudes of the problems? Make the problems as specific and measurable as possible.
What product, service, or result do you expect from this project? Provide a high-level description of the deliverables.
The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) defines a constraint as “a limiting factor that affects the execution of a project, program, or process.” For example, list budget and schedule constraints.
The PMBOK defines an assumption as “a factor in the planning process that is considered to be true, real, or certain, without proof or demonstration.” What are stakeholders assuming to be true?
Risk management starts day one of the project. As you walk through the charter process, ask the stakeholders about risks (i.e., threats and opportunities). Capture the most significant things that may hinder or advance the cause of the project.
Stakeholders include an individual, group, or organization who may be affected by the project. If you do not know an individual’s name, list the title of the stakeholder, their title, and organization.
If you know who will serve as team members, capture each team member’s name and department. If you do not know, list the title of the required position and department.
Still not sure about how to develop a project charter? Or just want to go a bit deeper? In this course, I walk you step-by-step through each component of the project charter. You can complete your own charter as you go through the course. Whether you are new to project management or just want a refresher, this course will give you the basics and much more! Enroll today.